<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 236 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52571</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on duty-paid inputs could not be denied merely because the duty on those inputs was later claimed to be not legally payable. The governing principle applied was that any objection to incorrect payment of duty must be examined at the stage and place where the duty was paid, not when the recipient avails credit. On that basis, the recipient&#039;s credit was held admissible, and the revenue challenge failed. The question of limitation was not examined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 May 2020 16:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91048" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 236 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52571</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on duty-paid inputs could not be denied merely because the duty on those inputs was later claimed to be not legally payable. The governing principle applied was that any objection to incorrect payment of duty must be examined at the stage and place where the duty was paid, not when the recipient avails credit. On that basis, the recipient&#039;s credit was held admissible, and the revenue challenge failed. The question of limitation was not examined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52571</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>