<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 417 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794531</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 271(1)(c) was not sustainable where the assessed income remained below the taxable limit and no tax was payable, because the statutory basis for computing tax sought to be evaded under Explanation 4 could not operate. The text notes that the case did not involve reduction of loss or conversion of loss into income, so the precondition for penalty was absent. On that footing, the penalty was deleted in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 08:39:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=910454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 417 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794531</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 271(1)(c) was not sustainable where the assessed income remained below the taxable limit and no tax was payable, because the statutory basis for computing tax sought to be evaded under Explanation 4 could not operate. The text notes that the case did not involve reduction of loss or conversion of loss into income, so the precondition for penalty was absent. On that footing, the penalty was deleted in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794531</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>