<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 422 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794536</link>
    <description>Audited books, a cash book and quantitative stock records supported the assessee&#039;s explanation that bank deposits arose from regular cash sales, and no defect was found in the accounts; the cash-deposit addition was therefore deleted. Purchases were also accepted where the assessee produced ledger entries, invoices, supplier confirmation and stock tally, because mere non-response to a section 133(6) notice and absence from Form 26AS did not outweigh the documentary record; the bogus-purchase addition was deleted. The note states that where accounts and corroborative records support the transactions, an addition cannot rest only on suspicion or third-party non-response.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 08:39:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=910449" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 422 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794536</link>
      <description>Audited books, a cash book and quantitative stock records supported the assessee&#039;s explanation that bank deposits arose from regular cash sales, and no defect was found in the accounts; the cash-deposit addition was therefore deleted. Purchases were also accepted where the assessee produced ledger entries, invoices, supplier confirmation and stock tally, because mere non-response to a section 133(6) notice and absence from Form 26AS did not outweigh the documentary record; the bogus-purchase addition was deleted. The note states that where accounts and corroborative records support the transactions, an addition cannot rest only on suspicion or third-party non-response.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794536</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>