<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 437 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, ODISHA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794551</link>
    <description>Mandatory statutory deposits towards NPV, compensatory afforestation and allied CAMPA charges paid as a condition for diversion of forest land were treated as consideration for a Government service, because the approval to use forest land for non-forest purposes was directly linked to the payment and conferred a business benefit. The deposits were not covered by the exemption for services relating to municipal or panchayat functions, so Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) did not apply. As the recipient was a business entity receiving a taxable Government service, GST was held payable under reverse charge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 08:39:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=910434" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 437 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, ODISHA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794551</link>
      <description>Mandatory statutory deposits towards NPV, compensatory afforestation and allied CAMPA charges paid as a condition for diversion of forest land were treated as consideration for a Government service, because the approval to use forest land for non-forest purposes was directly linked to the payment and conferred a business benefit. The deposits were not covered by the exemption for services relating to municipal or panchayat functions, so Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) did not apply. As the recipient was a business entity receiving a taxable Government service, GST was held payable under reverse charge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794551</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>