<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 443 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794557</link>
    <description>After rectification of the mismatch between the order-in-original and Form GST DRC-07, the writ petition was not entertained and the petitioner was left to pursue the statutory appeal. The order-in-original had imposed tax, interest and penalty under the CGST Act, and the Court directed that any appeal be filed with an application for condonation of delay and the required pre-deposit. No view was expressed on the merits, and the dispute was directed into the appellate channel.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 08:39:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=910428" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 443 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794557</link>
      <description>After rectification of the mismatch between the order-in-original and Form GST DRC-07, the writ petition was not entertained and the petitioner was left to pursue the statutory appeal. The order-in-original had imposed tax, interest and penalty under the CGST Act, and the Court directed that any appeal be filed with an application for condonation of delay and the required pre-deposit. No view was expressed on the merits, and the dispute was directed into the appellate channel.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794557</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>