<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Garnishee recovery against a partner&#039;s bank account can stand for crystallised partnership tax dues, not provisional attachment</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101474</link>
    <description>A partnership firm&#039;s crystallised tax dues may be recovered by issuing a garnishee notice against a partner&#039;s bank account when the recovery is directed under Section 79(1)(c)(i), not Section 83. The challenge failed because the impugned communication was on its face a recovery step after liability had crystallised, the demand against the firm itself had not been challenged, and partners are personally liable for the firm&#039;s dues. On those facts, no infirmity was found in the notice to the bank, and writ interference was unwarranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 08:39:43 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 08:39:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=910427" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Garnishee recovery against a partner&#039;s bank account can stand for crystallised partnership tax dues, not provisional attachment</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101474</link>
      <description>A partnership firm&#039;s crystallised tax dues may be recovered by issuing a garnishee notice against a partner&#039;s bank account when the recovery is directed under Section 79(1)(c)(i), not Section 83. The challenge failed because the impugned communication was on its face a recovery step after liability had crystallised, the demand against the firm itself had not been challenged, and partners are personally liable for the firm&#039;s dues. On those facts, no infirmity was found in the notice to the bank, and writ interference was unwarranted.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 08:39:43 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101474</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>