<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Procedural lapse in filing Form 10DA cannot defeat additional employment deduction when the report was already on record before intimation.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101461</link>
    <description>A one-day delay in uploading Form 10DA for the additional employment deduction was treated as a procedural lapse, not a substantive defect, because the form was already on record before the section 143(1) intimation. The Tribunal followed co-ordinate Bench rulings that the prescribed form is a compliance requirement for verification, and the claim cannot be denied once the form is available before assessment or intimation. Reliance on Wipro was distinguished as an exemption-case authority, not a deduction-case authority. The disallowance was deleted and the deduction allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 08:39:43 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 08:39:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=910414" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Procedural lapse in filing Form 10DA cannot defeat additional employment deduction when the report was already on record before intimation.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101461</link>
      <description>A one-day delay in uploading Form 10DA for the additional employment deduction was treated as a procedural lapse, not a substantive defect, because the form was already on record before the section 143(1) intimation. The Tribunal followed co-ordinate Bench rulings that the prescribed form is a compliance requirement for verification, and the claim cannot be denied once the form is available before assessment or intimation. Reliance on Wipro was distinguished as an exemption-case authority, not a deduction-case authority. The disallowance was deleted and the deduction allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 08:39:43 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101461</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>