<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1907 (4) TMI 3 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469827</link>
    <description>Waiver of the right to challenge an execution sale requires clear proof of knowledge and intentional relinquishment; it cannot be inferred where the alleged fraud or suppression was unknown to the party. The burden rests on the party asserting waiver. A limited concession on a fresh proclamation of sale or ordinary irregularities does not amount to a blanket abandonment of objections to fraud, suppression of process, or inadequacy of price, and public policy limits such construction. The appeal succeeded, the setting aside of the sale challenge was reversed, and the matter was remitted for evidence and determination on the validity of the sale challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 1907 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 17:31:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=910342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1907 (4) TMI 3 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469827</link>
      <description>Waiver of the right to challenge an execution sale requires clear proof of knowledge and intentional relinquishment; it cannot be inferred where the alleged fraud or suppression was unknown to the party. The burden rests on the party asserting waiver. A limited concession on a fresh proclamation of sale or ordinary irregularities does not amount to a blanket abandonment of objections to fraud, suppression of process, or inadequacy of price, and public policy limits such construction. The appeal succeeded, the setting aside of the sale challenge was reversed, and the matter was remitted for evidence and determination on the validity of the sale challenge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 1907 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469827</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>