https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469825 A review is maintainable where the earlier decision rests on an error apparent on the face of the record, including a self-evident factual mistake about the status and functions of the Official Assignee. The text notes that the post was not shown to be legally equivalent to District Judge for pay parity, and that equality principles cannot create a benefit without a corresponding entitlement. It also states that the earlier pay-related direction was reopened for fresh consideration of the representation, with prior monetary benefits to remain undisturbed unless recovery is later found justified. en-us Mon, 08 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Jul 2026 15:34:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469825 A review is maintainable where the earlier decision rests on an error apparent on the face of the record, including a self-evident factual mistake about the status and functions of the Official Assignee. The text notes that the post was not shown to be legally equivalent to District Judge for pay parity, and that equality principles cannot create a benefit without a corresponding entitlement. It also states that the earlier pay-related direction was reopened for fresh consideration of the representation, with prior monetary benefits to remain undisturbed unless recovery is later found justified. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 08 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469825