<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 226 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52555</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appellant to clear the goods on merit rate by paying appropriate duty. The appeal was disposed of on these terms, emphasizing that the customs authorities acted prematurely and without proper jurisdiction over the validity of the advance licence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 15:01:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 226 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52555</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appellant to clear the goods on merit rate by paying appropriate duty. The appeal was disposed of on these terms, emphasizing that the customs authorities acted prematurely and without proper jurisdiction over the validity of the advance licence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52555</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>