https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469817 Section 7 of the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909 does not extend the insolvency court's summary jurisdiction to deciding a complicated disputed title between the insolvent estate, the Board and a third party. Where the dispute concerns the validity of cancellation and reallotment orders, ownership of the superstructure, and better title, the matter must be left to the competent forum for determination. Section 36(5) was also inapplicable because the person in possession did not admit that the property belonged to the insolvent. The parties were therefore relegated to regular proceedings to work out their rights. en-us Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Jul 2026 11:44:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469817 Section 7 of the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909 does not extend the insolvency court's summary jurisdiction to deciding a complicated disputed title between the insolvent estate, the Board and a third party. Where the dispute concerns the validity of cancellation and reallotment orders, ownership of the superstructure, and better title, the matter must be left to the competent forum for determination. Section 36(5) was also inapplicable because the person in possession did not admit that the property belonged to the insolvent. The parties were therefore relegated to regular proceedings to work out their rights. Case-Laws IBC Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469817