https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794436 The Uttarakhand HC declined to entertain writ petitions challenging VAT orders because an effective statutory appeal remedy existed under the Uttarakhand Value Added Tax Act, with further appellate forums available. It rejected the argument that the remedy was illusory merely because the appellate authority could not examine excise policy issues, holding that those contentions could still be raised and considered in appeal. The petitions were disposed of with liberty to file appeals, and the appellate authority was directed to decide them on merits without rejecting them on delay if filed within the time granted. en-us Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Jul 2026 08:26:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794436 The Uttarakhand HC declined to entertain writ petitions challenging VAT orders because an effective statutory appeal remedy existed under the Uttarakhand Value Added Tax Act, with further appellate forums available. It rejected the argument that the remedy was illusory merely because the appellate authority could not examine excise policy issues, holding that those contentions could still be raised and considered in appeal. The petitions were disposed of with liberty to file appeals, and the appellate authority was directed to decide them on merits without rejecting them on delay if filed within the time granted. Case-Laws VAT / Sales Tax Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794436