<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 326 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794440</link>
    <description>Refund claims under section 11B, as applied to service tax, must be filed within one year from the relevant date. The claim failed because the appellant could not substantiate with challans and records that the disputed amount represented tax paid on non-taxable services within the prescribed period. The refund was therefore not proved maintainable to the extent disallowed, and the rejection was sustained in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 08:26:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=910261" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 326 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794440</link>
      <description>Refund claims under section 11B, as applied to service tax, must be filed within one year from the relevant date. The claim failed because the appellant could not substantiate with challans and records that the disputed amount represented tax paid on non-taxable services within the prescribed period. The refund was therefore not proved maintainable to the extent disallowed, and the rejection was sustained in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>