<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 328 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794442</link>
    <description>Refund of unutilized Cenvat credit was available on disputed input services under Rule 5 read with Rule 2(l) where the services were used for providing export output services and not for employees&#039; personal consumption. Insurance, rent-a-cab, air travel, hotel accommodation, restaurant, telecommunication and business support services were treated as input services because services used directly or indirectly in or in relation to output service fall within the definition unless specifically excluded. On the material noted, the alleged absence of nexus and the objection based on non-production of invoices were held unsustainable, and the refund claim was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 08:26:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=910259" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 328 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794442</link>
      <description>Refund of unutilized Cenvat credit was available on disputed input services under Rule 5 read with Rule 2(l) where the services were used for providing export output services and not for employees&#039; personal consumption. Insurance, rent-a-cab, air travel, hotel accommodation, restaurant, telecommunication and business support services were treated as input services because services used directly or indirectly in or in relation to output service fall within the definition unless specifically excluded. On the material noted, the alleged absence of nexus and the objection based on non-production of invoices were held unsustainable, and the refund claim was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794442</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>