<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 330 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794444</link>
    <description>FEMA penalties must match the precise statutory precondition invoked: Section 3(b) covered advance remittances to overseas suppliers, so liability under that provision was sustained, but the quantum was reduced. Section 10(6) read with Regulation 6(1) could not be applied to the proprietrix on the footing adopted in the adjudication, because the regulation applies to a person other than an individual resident in India; the corresponding penalty was deleted. Separate penalties on the authorised signatory were also unsustainable where he acted under a power of attorney for the proprietrix, because acts done in that capacity bind the grantor and do not warrant multiple penalties for the same business contraventions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 08:26:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=910257" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 330 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794444</link>
      <description>FEMA penalties must match the precise statutory precondition invoked: Section 3(b) covered advance remittances to overseas suppliers, so liability under that provision was sustained, but the quantum was reduced. Section 10(6) read with Regulation 6(1) could not be applied to the proprietrix on the footing adopted in the adjudication, because the regulation applies to a person other than an individual resident in India; the corresponding penalty was deleted. Separate penalties on the authorised signatory were also unsustainable where he acted under a power of attorney for the proprietrix, because acts done in that capacity bind the grantor and do not warrant multiple penalties for the same business contraventions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>