<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 337 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794451</link>
    <description>Safe Harbour rules could not be used to rework distribution segment profitability where the assessee had not elected those provisions, and the assessee&#039;s segmental allocation based on actuals and reasonable keys was accepted. Transfer pricing adjustments for intra-group services and lump sum licence fee/royalty could not be sustained at nil ALP under the Other Method without comparable uncontrolled transactions, and the related adjustments were deleted. Trademark fee already absorbed in the TNMM cost base could not be separately benchmarked again, as that would create an impermissible double adjustment; the TNMM treatment was therefore respected subject to verification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 08:26:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=910250" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 337 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794451</link>
      <description>Safe Harbour rules could not be used to rework distribution segment profitability where the assessee had not elected those provisions, and the assessee&#039;s segmental allocation based on actuals and reasonable keys was accepted. Transfer pricing adjustments for intra-group services and lump sum licence fee/royalty could not be sustained at nil ALP under the Other Method without comparable uncontrolled transactions, and the related adjustments were deleted. Trademark fee already absorbed in the TNMM cost base could not be separately benchmarked again, as that would create an impermissible double adjustment; the TNMM treatment was therefore respected subject to verification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794451</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>