<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 348 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794462</link>
    <description>Appeals were dismissed as infructuous because the consequential assessment order, passed in effect of the revisionary order, no longer survived once the revisionary order was set aside for fresh consideration. The tribunal treated the subsistence of the assessment order as dependent on the revisionary order and, after that order ceased to operate, found no live controversy requiring adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 08:26:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=910239" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 348 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794462</link>
      <description>Appeals were dismissed as infructuous because the consequential assessment order, passed in effect of the revisionary order, no longer survived once the revisionary order was set aside for fresh consideration. The tribunal treated the subsistence of the assessment order as dependent on the revisionary order and, after that order ceased to operate, found no live controversy requiring adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>