https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794470 Regular bail in a GST and cess evasion prosecution was considered appropriate where the case rested mainly on documentary and electronic material, the complaint had already been filed, and the applicant remained in judicial custody without any further need for custodial interrogation. The seizure memo did not show recovery of tobacco, nicotine, khaini, zarda or gutkha, and the classification of the seized goods was left for trial. Applying settled bail principles in economic offences, including the nature of accusation, possibility of tampering, and the triple test, the court treated continued detention as unnecessary and granted bail with Article 21 liberty considerations in view. en-us Thu, 25 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Jul 2026 08:26:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794470 Regular bail in a GST and cess evasion prosecution was considered appropriate where the case rested mainly on documentary and electronic material, the complaint had already been filed, and the applicant remained in judicial custody without any further need for custodial interrogation. The seizure memo did not show recovery of tobacco, nicotine, khaini, zarda or gutkha, and the classification of the seized goods was left for trial. Applying settled bail principles in economic offences, including the nature of accusation, possibility of tampering, and the triple test, the court treated continued detention as unnecessary and granted bail with Article 21 liberty considerations in view. Case-Laws GST Thu, 25 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794470