<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 219 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52546</link>
    <description>Wires and cables destroyed during mandatory quality control testing may escape central excise duty only if the assessee follows the prescribed removal and remission procedure, properly accounts for the tested goods and scrap, and establishes the destruction to the department. Where goods are removed after RG-1 entry, compliance with the procedure under Rule 49 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, including proper entries and an application for remission, is required. On the stated facts, the assessee failed to satisfy those requirements and could not enable departmental verification of the testing or scrap, so duty liability was confirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 14:42:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91023" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 219 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52546</link>
      <description>Wires and cables destroyed during mandatory quality control testing may escape central excise duty only if the assessee follows the prescribed removal and remission procedure, properly accounts for the tested goods and scrap, and establishes the destruction to the department. Where goods are removed after RG-1 entry, compliance with the procedure under Rule 49 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, including proper entries and an application for remission, is required. On the stated facts, the assessee failed to satisfy those requirements and could not enable departmental verification of the testing or scrap, so duty liability was confirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52546</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>