https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794473 Where an efficacious statutory appeal lies under the GST regime, writ jurisdiction under Article 226 will ordinarily not be exercised unless an exceptional case is shown. The Court held that the impugned order was appealable to the Appellate Tribunal under the CGST Act and Rules, and that the petitioner had not established any basis to bypass that remedy. The Tribunal was considered competent to examine the merits, including revenue neutrality, and the petitioner was directed to pursue the statutory appeal after complying with the pre-deposit requirement. en-us Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Jul 2026 08:26:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794473 Where an efficacious statutory appeal lies under the GST regime, writ jurisdiction under Article 226 will ordinarily not be exercised unless an exceptional case is shown. The Court held that the impugned order was appealable to the Appellate Tribunal under the CGST Act and Rules, and that the petitioner had not established any basis to bypass that remedy. The Tribunal was considered competent to examine the merits, including revenue neutrality, and the petitioner was directed to pursue the statutory appeal after complying with the pre-deposit requirement. Case-Laws GST Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794473