<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 257 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52544</link>
    <description>Procedural defects in Modvat documentation did not justify denial where duty payment, receipt and use of inputs were established, so credit was allowed despite an invoice marked &quot;extra copy&quot; by computer error. S.S. plates used to fabricate capital goods were held eligible, and welding electrodes used in fabrication and maintenance of plant and machinery also qualified for credit. Delay in filing declarations and installation certificates under Rule 57T was treated as procedural and condonable, so it did not defeat credit. Insulating materials, forklift wheel and tyre assembly, and a power module were likewise admissible, and the balance credit adjustment was accepted as a bookkeeping correction. The disallowances and penalties therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 14:00:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 257 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52544</link>
      <description>Procedural defects in Modvat documentation did not justify denial where duty payment, receipt and use of inputs were established, so credit was allowed despite an invoice marked &quot;extra copy&quot; by computer error. S.S. plates used to fabricate capital goods were held eligible, and welding electrodes used in fabrication and maintenance of plant and machinery also qualified for credit. Delay in filing declarations and installation certificates under Rule 57T was treated as procedural and condonable, so it did not defeat credit. Insulating materials, forklift wheel and tyre assembly, and a power module were likewise admissible, and the balance credit adjustment was accepted as a bookkeeping correction. The disallowances and penalties therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52544</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>