<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 225 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794339</link>
    <description>Limitation for enforcing a foreign award runs from accrual of the right to apply, not necessarily from the award date; receipt of the signed award marked accrual here, so the petition was timely. Public policy refusal under Section 48 was said to be confined to exceptional cases, and the commercial arrangement was treated as a performance-linked advance incentive structure rather than a factoring transaction under the Factoring Regulation Act, 2011, so no fundamental policy breach was made out. The note also records that joint and several liability, a conditional forbearance arrangement, and the absence of express relinquishment did not bar enforcement against the judgment debtor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 08:15:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=910075" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 225 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794339</link>
      <description>Limitation for enforcing a foreign award runs from accrual of the right to apply, not necessarily from the award date; receipt of the signed award marked accrual here, so the petition was timely. Public policy refusal under Section 48 was said to be confined to exceptional cases, and the commercial arrangement was treated as a performance-linked advance incentive structure rather than a factoring transaction under the Factoring Regulation Act, 2011, so no fundamental policy breach was made out. The note also records that joint and several liability, a conditional forbearance arrangement, and the absence of express relinquishment did not bar enforcement against the judgment debtor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>