<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 225 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794339</link>
    <description>Limitation for enforcing a foreign award begins when the right to apply accrues, which may be when the award holder receives the signed award rather than its date of signature; the enforcement petition was therefore within the applicable period. Public policy refusal under Section 48 is confined to exceptional fundamental legal infractions: a performance-linked commercial advance incentive arrangement was not an assignment of receivables or a factoring transaction. Joint and several liability remained enforceable against the judgment debtor because recovery efforts and a conditional forbearance arrangement with a co-obligor did not constitute express waiver, novation, or extinguishment. The foreign award was enforceable, with all objections rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 08:15:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=910075" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 225 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794339</link>
      <description>Limitation for enforcing a foreign award begins when the right to apply accrues, which may be when the award holder receives the signed award rather than its date of signature; the enforcement petition was therefore within the applicable period. Public policy refusal under Section 48 is confined to exceptional fundamental legal infractions: a performance-linked commercial advance incentive arrangement was not an assignment of receivables or a factoring transaction. Joint and several liability remained enforceable against the judgment debtor because recovery efforts and a conditional forbearance arrangement with a co-obligor did not constitute express waiver, novation, or extinguishment. The foreign award was enforceable, with all objections rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>