<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 234 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794348</link>
    <description>Tour operator service tax was considered in relation to buses operated under an arrangement with a tourism corporation. The key distinction applied was between organising or arranging tours, and mere point-to-point passenger transport without a common tour contract or organised tour activity. On the stated analysis, the buses were treated as passenger transport rather than tour operation, and the appellant was not liable to pay service tax on tour operator services.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 08:15:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=910066" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 234 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794348</link>
      <description>Tour operator service tax was considered in relation to buses operated under an arrangement with a tourism corporation. The key distinction applied was between organising or arranging tours, and mere point-to-point passenger transport without a common tour contract or organised tour activity. On the stated analysis, the buses were treated as passenger transport rather than tour operation, and the appellant was not liable to pay service tax on tour operator services.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794348</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>