<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 239 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794353</link>
    <description>Retention of seized cash, documents and electronic media was sustained because the explanation for their lawful source was not credibly established; the claimed property-transaction trail was inconsistent, relied on unregistered sale agreements, and did not satisfactorily account for the recovered cash. The challenge based on absence of recorded reasons under sections 17 and 8 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act failed because the record showed search on reasonable belief and compliance with the statutory requirements. The objection based on the searched person&#039;s death and a later supplementary complaint also failed, as a PMLA search may validly proceed against a person in possession of proceeds of crime even if not an accused in the scheduled offence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 08:15:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=910061" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 239 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794353</link>
      <description>Retention of seized cash, documents and electronic media was sustained because the explanation for their lawful source was not credibly established; the claimed property-transaction trail was inconsistent, relied on unregistered sale agreements, and did not satisfactorily account for the recovered cash. The challenge based on absence of recorded reasons under sections 17 and 8 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act failed because the record showed search on reasonable belief and compliance with the statutory requirements. The objection based on the searched person&#039;s death and a later supplementary complaint also failed, as a PMLA search may validly proceed against a person in possession of proceeds of crime even if not an accused in the scheduled offence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794353</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>