<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 247 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794361</link>
    <description>A section 9 insolvency petition cannot be admitted where contemporaneous emails, minutes, debit notes and GST material show a real pre-existing dispute on supply, quality, quantity, dispatch and the genuineness of the claimed operational debt; the Mobilox test requires more than a spurious denial, so the admission could not stand. A fresh insolvency admission also cannot be made while an earlier CIRP moratorium for the same corporate debtor is already operating, because the Code contemplates only one consolidated insolvency process and the subsequent admission was without jurisdiction. Both admissions were set aside and the debtor was released from CIRP consequences.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 08:15:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=910053" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 247 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794361</link>
      <description>A section 9 insolvency petition cannot be admitted where contemporaneous emails, minutes, debit notes and GST material show a real pre-existing dispute on supply, quality, quantity, dispatch and the genuineness of the claimed operational debt; the Mobilox test requires more than a spurious denial, so the admission could not stand. A fresh insolvency admission also cannot be made while an earlier CIRP moratorium for the same corporate debtor is already operating, because the Code contemplates only one consolidated insolvency process and the subsequent admission was without jurisdiction. Both admissions were set aside and the debtor was released from CIRP consequences.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>