https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794370 An operational creditor's claim was rejected because the claimant failed to produce sufficient, specific and corroborative evidence to show that the alleged debt was due from the corporate debtor alone. The NCLAT recorded that the IRP/RP and the Adjudicating Authority had exercised due care in verifying the claim, and found no error in law or fact in that assessment. The Supreme Court then dismissed the civil appeal and the pending applications, affirming that the claim remained unsubstantiated on the record. en-us Mon, 02 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Jul 2026 08:15:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794370 An operational creditor's claim was rejected because the claimant failed to produce sufficient, specific and corroborative evidence to show that the alleged debt was due from the corporate debtor alone. The NCLAT recorded that the IRP/RP and the Adjudicating Authority had exercised due care in verifying the claim, and found no error in law or fact in that assessment. The Supreme Court then dismissed the civil appeal and the pending applications, affirming that the claim remained unsubstantiated on the record. Case-Laws IBC Mon, 02 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794370