<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 258 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794372</link>
    <description>At the quashing stage, the HC held that FIR allegations of forged documents, collusion in NCLT proceedings, and disclosure of confidential company information disclosed a prima facie cognizable offence, so the truthfulness of those claims could not be tested then and investigation had to continue. The objection that the Berhampore police station lacked territorial jurisdiction was rejected because territorial limits do not, by themselves, justify quashing where the complaint discloses multi-jurisdictional elements. Allegations of mala fides were also found insufficient to stop the proceeding when cognizable offences were otherwise made out.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 08:15:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=910042" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 258 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794372</link>
      <description>At the quashing stage, the HC held that FIR allegations of forged documents, collusion in NCLT proceedings, and disclosure of confidential company information disclosed a prima facie cognizable offence, so the truthfulness of those claims could not be tested then and investigation had to continue. The objection that the Berhampore police station lacked territorial jurisdiction was rejected because territorial limits do not, by themselves, justify quashing where the complaint discloses multi-jurisdictional elements. Allegations of mala fides were also found insufficient to stop the proceeding when cognizable offences were otherwise made out.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794372</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>