<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 274 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794388</link>
    <description>Intra-group service charges were treated as business-related services, not as shareholder, stewardship, duplicate, incidental or on-call services, but the arm&#039;s length price under the transactional net margin method had not been examined in light of the prescribed method; the matter was restored to the TPO for fresh verification. Additions arising from processing of the return and the claim for set-off of brought forward business loss and unabsorbed depreciation were found to require factual verification; those issues were restored to the jurisdictional AO for decision in accordance with law. The appeal resulted only in remand and statistical relief, without final deletion of the transfer pricing addition on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 05:11:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=910026" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 274 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794388</link>
      <description>Intra-group service charges were treated as business-related services, not as shareholder, stewardship, duplicate, incidental or on-call services, but the arm&#039;s length price under the transactional net margin method had not been examined in light of the prescribed method; the matter was restored to the TPO for fresh verification. Additions arising from processing of the return and the claim for set-off of brought forward business loss and unabsorbed depreciation were found to require factual verification; those issues were restored to the jurisdictional AO for decision in accordance with law. The appeal resulted only in remand and statistical relief, without final deletion of the transfer pricing addition on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794388</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>