<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 275 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794389</link>
    <description>Failure to issue a draft assessment order to an eligible assessee under the mandatory transfer pricing procedure was treated as a jurisdictional defect. The omission was not cured by a later corrigendum, because the draft order requirement must be followed before finalising the assessment. The note follows Vijay Television and the Supreme Court&#039;s approval in Rinku R. Rai, and treats S.G. Asia Holdings as factually inapplicable. On that basis, the assessment order was held vitiated and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 08:15:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=910025" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 275 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794389</link>
      <description>Failure to issue a draft assessment order to an eligible assessee under the mandatory transfer pricing procedure was treated as a jurisdictional defect. The omission was not cured by a later corrigendum, because the draft order requirement must be followed before finalising the assessment. The note follows Vijay Television and the Supreme Court&#039;s approval in Rinku R. Rai, and treats S.G. Asia Holdings as factually inapplicable. On that basis, the assessment order was held vitiated and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794389</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>