<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 201 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52525</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal set aside the duty imposition on a manufacturing unit for undervaluation of goods sold to a related trading unit. The tribunal found that without financial interconnection and mutual interest, the trading unit could not be deemed related to the manufacturing unit. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellants, granting them consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 13:08:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 201 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52525</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal set aside the duty imposition on a manufacturing unit for undervaluation of goods sold to a related trading unit. The tribunal found that without financial interconnection and mutual interest, the trading unit could not be deemed related to the manufacturing unit. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellants, granting them consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>