<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 283 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794397</link>
    <description>Disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D was held unsustainable where the assessee had not earned any exempt income during the relevant assessment year. The amendment inserting the Explanation to section 14A with effect from 1 April 2022 was treated as prospective and not applicable to assessment year 2020-21. On that basis, the absence of exempt income meant that no disallowance under section 14A could be made, and the deletion of the disallowance was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 08:15:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=910017" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 283 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794397</link>
      <description>Disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D was held unsustainable where the assessee had not earned any exempt income during the relevant assessment year. The amendment inserting the Explanation to section 14A with effect from 1 April 2022 was treated as prospective and not applicable to assessment year 2020-21. On that basis, the absence of exempt income meant that no disallowance under section 14A could be made, and the deletion of the disallowance was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794397</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>