<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1866 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469789</link>
    <description>Interest on fixed deposits placed with nationalised banks was treated as surplus-fund income outside the society&#039;s operational business activity, so it did not qualify for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i). Rental income, after standard deduction, was also held to be unconnected with the society&#039;s core cooperative objects and therefore outside section 80P(2)(a)(i). The alternative claim under section 80P(2)(c)(ii) was rejected because the interest and rental receipts were not treated as income from a specified cooperative activity and the claim had not been raised in the return. The assessee&#039;s section 80P deduction claim thus failed on all grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 19:00:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=909923" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1866 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469789</link>
      <description>Interest on fixed deposits placed with nationalised banks was treated as surplus-fund income outside the society&#039;s operational business activity, so it did not qualify for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i). Rental income, after standard deduction, was also held to be unconnected with the society&#039;s core cooperative objects and therefore outside section 80P(2)(a)(i). The alternative claim under section 80P(2)(c)(ii) was rejected because the interest and rental receipts were not treated as income from a specified cooperative activity and the claim had not been raised in the return. The assessee&#039;s section 80P deduction claim thus failed on all grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469789</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>