<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 193 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52515</link>
    <description>Imported Vitamin C was found to have a false country-of-origin declaration, because the importer and foreign supplier failed to substantiate the asserted United States origin with reliable evidence. Verification showed the supporting Form 9 and related documents were unreliable, and the stated manufacturing premises did not exist as a manufacturing unit. Correspondence also suggested an attempt to misdescribe Chinese goods as United States-origin goods to avoid anti-dumping duty. On these facts, adverse inference was justified, the claim of United States origin was rejected, and the levy of anti-dumping duty was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 12:19:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90992" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 193 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52515</link>
      <description>Imported Vitamin C was found to have a false country-of-origin declaration, because the importer and foreign supplier failed to substantiate the asserted United States origin with reliable evidence. Verification showed the supporting Form 9 and related documents were unreliable, and the stated manufacturing premises did not exist as a manufacturing unit. Correspondence also suggested an attempt to misdescribe Chinese goods as United States-origin goods to avoid anti-dumping duty. On these facts, adverse inference was justified, the claim of United States origin was rejected, and the levy of anti-dumping duty was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>