<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 937 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469774</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC was granted after the Court considered the materials in the case diary and found it appropriate to protect the petitioners in the event of arrest. The relief was made subject to the conditions under Section 438(2) CrPC, meaning bail would operate with the statutory safeguards attached to anticipatory release.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 17:34:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=909895" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 937 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469774</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC was granted after the Court considered the materials in the case diary and found it appropriate to protect the petitioners in the event of arrest. The relief was made subject to the conditions under Section 438(2) CrPC, meaning bail would operate with the statutory safeguards attached to anticipatory release.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>