<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 155 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794269</link>
    <description>Markup earned on resale of ocean freight or cargo space purchased on a principal-to-principal basis was analysed as trading margin, not consideration for Business Support Service, intermediary service, or a taxable composite service. The document notes that where a freight forwarder buys space on its own account, bears commercial risk, and resells it at a markup, the transaction is a principal-to-principal trade in space rather than facilitation of another person&#039;s service. It also states that the Revenue&#039;s attempt to treat the markup as bundled support services was unsupported by evidence, and that the applicable circulars and coordinate-bench view exclude such activity from service tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 08:49:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=909850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 155 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794269</link>
      <description>Markup earned on resale of ocean freight or cargo space purchased on a principal-to-principal basis was analysed as trading margin, not consideration for Business Support Service, intermediary service, or a taxable composite service. The document notes that where a freight forwarder buys space on its own account, bears commercial risk, and resells it at a markup, the transaction is a principal-to-principal trade in space rather than facilitation of another person&#039;s service. It also states that the Revenue&#039;s attempt to treat the markup as bundled support services was unsupported by evidence, and that the applicable circulars and coordinate-bench view exclude such activity from service tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794269</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>