https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794280 Section 66(2) of the PMLA permits the Director or authorised authority to share information with the concerned agency where material suggests contraventions of other laws, so communication originating in PMLA proceedings can lawfully support registration of a crime under FEMA or other penal statutes when the disclosure is detailed and relevant. The document also notes that, for UAPA-related allegations, prima facie material of foreign funding, fund withdrawal through ATMs, concealment of identity, card circulation, and alleged channelisation of funds into extremist areas is sufficient to justify continued investigation at the threshold, without a final finding on guilt. The Karnataka HC declined to halt the investigation. en-us Wed, 01 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 Jul 2026 08:49:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794280 Section 66(2) of the PMLA permits the Director or authorised authority to share information with the concerned agency where material suggests contraventions of other laws, so communication originating in PMLA proceedings can lawfully support registration of a crime under FEMA or other penal statutes when the disclosure is detailed and relevant. The document also notes that, for UAPA-related allegations, prima facie material of foreign funding, fund withdrawal through ATMs, concealment of identity, card circulation, and alleged channelisation of funds into extremist areas is sufficient to justify continued investigation at the threshold, without a final finding on guilt. The Karnataka HC declined to halt the investigation. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 01 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794280