<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 172 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794286</link>
    <description>The three-month period for filing a bankruptcy application under Section 121(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is directory rather than mandatory because it prescribes no consequence for non-compliance, outer limitation bar, or exclusion of the Limitation Act. Section 238A preserves the application of Section 5 of the Limitation Act, enabling delay to be condoned where sufficient cause is established. Accordingly, a bankruptcy application cannot be rejected solely because it was filed after the prescribed three-month period, and refusal to condone delay on that basis is unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 08:49:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=909833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 172 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794286</link>
      <description>The three-month period for filing a bankruptcy application under Section 121(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is directory rather than mandatory because it prescribes no consequence for non-compliance, outer limitation bar, or exclusion of the Limitation Act. Section 238A preserves the application of Section 5 of the Limitation Act, enabling delay to be condoned where sufficient cause is established. Accordingly, a bankruptcy application cannot be rejected solely because it was filed after the prescribed three-month period, and refusal to condone delay on that basis is unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794286</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>