<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 184 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794298</link>
    <description>An ad hoc 15% addition from cash sales during the demonetisation period was held unsustainable as unexplained cash credits under section 68 where the books were not rejected and no adverse material supported estimation. The assessee had recorded the sales in regular books and reflected them in the VAT return, while the Assessing Officer relied only on suspicion about manipulation and the improbability of the sales volume. In the absence of a comparative study, stock discrepancy, or incriminating evidence, a part addition on conjecture could not be sustained. The addition was deleted and the issue went in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 08:49:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=909821" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 184 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794298</link>
      <description>An ad hoc 15% addition from cash sales during the demonetisation period was held unsustainable as unexplained cash credits under section 68 where the books were not rejected and no adverse material supported estimation. The assessee had recorded the sales in regular books and reflected them in the VAT return, while the Assessing Officer relied only on suspicion about manipulation and the improbability of the sales volume. In the absence of a comparative study, stock discrepancy, or incriminating evidence, a part addition on conjecture could not be sustained. The addition was deleted and the issue went in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794298</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>