<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 186 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52505</link>
    <description>Raw material consumed for statutory quality testing before the remaining material entered production was treated as part of the manufacturing process, because the testing was necessary to satisfy legal requirements for the finished medicines and formed an integral step in manufacture. On that basis, duty credit on the tested quantity was held admissible, and the denial of credit by the lower authorities was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:54:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90982" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 186 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52505</link>
      <description>Raw material consumed for statutory quality testing before the remaining material entered production was treated as part of the manufacturing process, because the testing was necessary to satisfy legal requirements for the finished medicines and formed an integral step in manufacture. On that basis, duty credit on the tested quantity was held admissible, and the denial of credit by the lower authorities was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52505</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>