<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 198 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794312</link>
    <description>Section 68 was held inapplicable where fully recorded share transactions were part of a regular trading business, routed through banking channels and a demat account, squared up quickly, and already reflected in business results. On those undisputed facts, the Tribunal found no element of unexplained cash credit and deleted the addition on the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 08:49:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=909807" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 198 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794312</link>
      <description>Section 68 was held inapplicable where fully recorded share transactions were part of a regular trading business, routed through banking channels and a demat account, squared up quickly, and already reflected in business results. On those undisputed facts, the Tribunal found no element of unexplained cash credit and deleted the addition on the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794312</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>