<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 203 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794317</link>
    <description>Documentary evidence can sustain exemption on long-term capital gains where shares are shown to have been acquired, held and sold through recognised market channels. The assessee produced a gift deed, demat statements, contract notes, stock exchange transaction details, STT payment proof and bank records, while the Revenue relied mainly on a general report on penny stock operators without specific material linking the assessee to manipulation or a sham transaction. Generalised third-party material, without independent corroboration, could not displace the assessee&#039;s documents. As the Revenue failed to rebut the evidence, denial of exemption and addition under section 68 were not sustainable; the addition was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 08:49:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=909802" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 203 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794317</link>
      <description>Documentary evidence can sustain exemption on long-term capital gains where shares are shown to have been acquired, held and sold through recognised market channels. The assessee produced a gift deed, demat statements, contract notes, stock exchange transaction details, STT payment proof and bank records, while the Revenue relied mainly on a general report on penny stock operators without specific material linking the assessee to manipulation or a sham transaction. Generalised third-party material, without independent corroboration, could not displace the assessee&#039;s documents. As the Revenue failed to rebut the evidence, denial of exemption and addition under section 68 were not sustainable; the addition was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794317</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>