<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 206 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794320</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 270A could not survive where the quantum additions forming its sole basis were set aside and remanded for fresh adjudication. Once the foundational additions lost finality, the penalty lacked a subsisting basis and was deleted. The assessee succeeded on the principal challenge, while the Assessing Officer was left free to initiate penalty proceedings again if warranted by the outcome of the remanded quantum matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 08:49:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=909799" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 206 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794320</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 270A could not survive where the quantum additions forming its sole basis were set aside and remanded for fresh adjudication. Once the foundational additions lost finality, the penalty lacked a subsisting basis and was deleted. The assessee succeeded on the principal challenge, while the Assessing Officer was left free to initiate penalty proceedings again if warranted by the outcome of the remanded quantum matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794320</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>