<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 222 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794336</link>
    <description>The writ petition against the show cause notice and consequential order was dismissed, and the court granted liberty to the petitioner to place an appropriate submission before the assessing authority on any defect in FORM GST DRC-01. The dispute therefore turned on the validity of the notice process, but the petitioner was left to pursue the alleged procedural defect before the assessing authority rather than through writ relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 08:49:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=909783" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 222 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794336</link>
      <description>The writ petition against the show cause notice and consequential order was dismissed, and the court granted liberty to the petitioner to place an appropriate submission before the assessing authority on any defect in FORM GST DRC-01. The dispute therefore turned on the validity of the notice process, but the petitioner was left to pursue the alleged procedural defect before the assessing authority rather than through writ relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794336</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>