<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Banking tax issues: actuarial employee-benefit provisions, NPA interest, securities valuation and MAT non-applicability to new banks</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101343</link>
    <description>The note records an ITAT ruling on banking and employee-benefit tax issues. Actuarially valued pension, leave-travel/home-travel, and other long-term employee benefit provisions were treated as ascertained liabilities and allowed, while privilege leave encashment remained deductible only on actual payment. Interest on NPAs and non-performing investments was taxed only on real income, and securities in AFS/HFT/HTM categories were accepted at lower of cost or market value. The Tribunal also held that MAT does not apply to corresponding new banks, upheld business-expediency deductions for staff welfare and retired employees&#039; medical benefits, and remitted or rejected several claims for lack of verification or supporting material.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 08:49:55 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 08:49:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=909768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Banking tax issues: actuarial employee-benefit provisions, NPA interest, securities valuation and MAT non-applicability to new banks</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101343</link>
      <description>The note records an ITAT ruling on banking and employee-benefit tax issues. Actuarially valued pension, leave-travel/home-travel, and other long-term employee benefit provisions were treated as ascertained liabilities and allowed, while privilege leave encashment remained deductible only on actual payment. Interest on NPAs and non-performing investments was taxed only on real income, and securities in AFS/HFT/HTM categories were accepted at lower of cost or market value. The Tribunal also held that MAT does not apply to corresponding new banks, upheld business-expediency deductions for staff welfare and retired employees&#039; medical benefits, and remitted or rejected several claims for lack of verification or supporting material.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 08:49:55 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101343</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>