<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Claim verification in insolvency: unsupported farmer compensation failed, and lease charges were limited to the insolvency commencement date.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101331</link>
    <description>In insolvency claim verification, a resolution professional may call for further evidence or clarification to substantiate disputed components, and doing so remains within the verification function rather than an adjudicatory exercise. Unsupported farmer&#039;s compensation and related interest claims tied to leased land were not admitted where the claimant failed to explain the outstanding basis, the attributable land area, or payment particulars. Time extension charges were confined to the insolvency commencement date, and the resolution professional&#039;s proportionate recalculation after excluding sub-leased land and correcting a mathematical error was sustained; the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 08:49:55 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 08:49:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=909756" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Claim verification in insolvency: unsupported farmer compensation failed, and lease charges were limited to the insolvency commencement date.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101331</link>
      <description>In insolvency claim verification, a resolution professional may call for further evidence or clarification to substantiate disputed components, and doing so remains within the verification function rather than an adjudicatory exercise. Unsupported farmer&#039;s compensation and related interest claims tied to leased land were not admitted where the claimant failed to explain the outstanding basis, the attributable land area, or payment particulars. Time extension charges were confined to the insolvency commencement date, and the resolution professional&#039;s proportionate recalculation after excluding sub-leased land and correcting a mathematical error was sustained; the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 08:49:55 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>