<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1947 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469751</link>
    <description>Service tax under reverse charge was upheld on professional and consulting engineering fees, corporate cost allocations for seconded employees and reimbursements, certain repairs and ancillary charges, demurrage, and specified reimbursements. Liability was set aside for bank guarantee commission reimbursements and online magazine or book subscriptions. Questions concerning bank charges, whether software and subscription payments were correctly characterised, and the treatment of a label dispenser and certain production items were remanded for further examination of records. The extended limitation period was also upheld for the relevant assessment period, indicating acceptance of the wider time bar basis on the available facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 20:38:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=909743" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1947 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469751</link>
      <description>Service tax under reverse charge was upheld on professional and consulting engineering fees, corporate cost allocations for seconded employees and reimbursements, certain repairs and ancillary charges, demurrage, and specified reimbursements. Liability was set aside for bank guarantee commission reimbursements and online magazine or book subscriptions. Questions concerning bank charges, whether software and subscription payments were correctly characterised, and the treatment of a label dispenser and certain production items were remanded for further examination of records. The extended limitation period was also upheld for the relevant assessment period, indicating acceptance of the wider time bar basis on the available facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>