<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (5) TMI 72 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469749</link>
    <description>Fair and temperate criticism of judicial decisions is protected, even where the criticism is strong, but imputations of improper motives against judges or language that brings the judiciary or administration of justice into hatred, contempt, or disrepute may amount to contempt. On the material described, the affidavits denying the newspaper versions were not contradicted and no further material justified continuing the matter, so no contempt action was pursued and the matter was closed without a finding of contempt.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 17:38:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=909710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (5) TMI 72 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469749</link>
      <description>Fair and temperate criticism of judicial decisions is protected, even where the criticism is strong, but imputations of improper motives against judges or language that brings the judiciary or administration of justice into hatred, contempt, or disrepute may amount to contempt. On the material described, the affidavits denying the newspaper versions were not contradicted and no further material justified continuing the matter, so no contempt action was pursued and the matter was closed without a finding of contempt.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469749</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>