<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 242 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52489</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Chief Commissioner&#039;s order in a case involving alleged non-compliance with the EPCG Scheme export terms and technical know-how fees declaration. The appellants challenged penalty imposition and denial of exemption benefits, citing relevant judgments. The Tribunal noted discrepancies, emphasizing re-examination of service charges in assessable value, Section 114(A) penalty, and concessional duty rates entitlement. The matter was remanded for thorough reconsideration, effective hearing of appellants&#039; arguments, and fresh determination, highlighting the importance of comprehensive addressal of raised points and ensuring a fair adjudication process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:19:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90966" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 242 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52489</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Chief Commissioner&#039;s order in a case involving alleged non-compliance with the EPCG Scheme export terms and technical know-how fees declaration. The appellants challenged penalty imposition and denial of exemption benefits, citing relevant judgments. The Tribunal noted discrepancies, emphasizing re-examination of service charges in assessable value, Section 114(A) penalty, and concessional duty rates entitlement. The matter was remanded for thorough reconsideration, effective hearing of appellants&#039; arguments, and fresh determination, highlighting the importance of comprehensive addressal of raised points and ensuring a fair adjudication process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52489</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>