https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469744 A writ court under Article 226 cannot reappraise evidence or interfere with concurrent fact findings merely because an affirming appellate or revisional order does not discuss every item of contrary material. Interference is justified only where the finding is based on no evidence, is perverse, ignores a vital plea or material evidence affecting the result, or shows a manifest error of law causing failure of justice. If the original fact-finding authority has considered the evidence, a general affirmance need not restate the entire record or separately answer each contrary circumstance. Mere non-reference to some evidence, by itself, is not enough for interference. en-us Tue, 15 May 1973 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 02 Jul 2026 14:52:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469744 A writ court under Article 226 cannot reappraise evidence or interfere with concurrent fact findings merely because an affirming appellate or revisional order does not discuss every item of contrary material. Interference is justified only where the finding is based on no evidence, is perverse, ignores a vital plea or material evidence affecting the result, or shows a manifest error of law causing failure of justice. If the original fact-finding authority has considered the evidence, a general affirmance need not restate the entire record or separately answer each contrary circumstance. Mere non-reference to some evidence, by itself, is not enough for interference. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 15 May 1973 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469744