https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=73626 The Supreme Court stressed zero tolerance against citing, producing, or relying on fake, non-existent, or hallucinated precedents generated through artificial intelligence, and held that such material contaminates adjudication and undermines the sanctity of judicial decision-making. It said counsel commit misconduct by citing unverified AI-generated judgments, and that a judge's reliance on hallucinated material is an equally serious lapse. The Court also called for accountability measures and human oversight in the legitimate use of AI as an aid to adjudication. en-us Thu, 02 Jul 2026 14:16:03 +0530 Thu, 02 Jul 2026 14:16:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=73626 The Supreme Court stressed zero tolerance against citing, producing, or relying on fake, non-existent, or hallucinated precedents generated through artificial intelligence, and held that such material contaminates adjudication and undermines the sanctity of judicial decision-making. It said counsel commit misconduct by citing unverified AI-generated judgments, and that a judge's reliance on hallucinated material is an equally serious lapse. The Court also called for accountability measures and human oversight in the legitimate use of AI as an aid to adjudication. News - Thu, 02 Jul 2026 14:16:03 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=73626